The situation mentioned in PLJ 1997 SC 985 concerned a declaration that respondents, remaining co-sharers, were being owners with the land. The match was initially dismissed, but on enchantment, it was decreed in favor from the respondents. A present by a person in insolvent circumstances is valid if it is https://messiahohkmg.pointblog.net/the-ultimate-guide-to-land-ownership-and-title-advocate-in-karachi-near-me-73303486